{"id":1478,"date":"2014-01-08T20:35:18","date_gmt":"2014-01-08T18:35:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/?p=1478"},"modified":"2014-01-08T20:35:18","modified_gmt":"2014-01-08T18:35:18","slug":"chpli-belediyeye-sayistay-soku","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/?p=1478","title":{"rendered":"CHP&#8217;li belediyeye Say\u0131\u015ftay \u015foku"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>ANTALYA B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi eski Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Menderes T\u00fcrel d\u00f6neminde projelendirilip 21 Ocak 2008 tarihinde projesi imzalanan fakat 2009 yerel se\u00e7imlerinin ard\u0131ndan g\u00f6reve gelen Mustafa Akayd\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan mahkeme kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek iptal edilen 100\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc Y\u0131l Spor Kompleksi projesi ile ilgili Say\u0131\u015ftay 6\u2019nc\u0131 Dairesi\u2019nden \u015fok bir karar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131lama Heyeti Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Hasan Fehmi Ezber, Denet\u00e7i Mustafa Akyol ve Savc\u0131 Mustafa G\u00f6rmezo\u011flu taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan raporda; i\u00e7erisinde 30 bin ki\u015fi seyirci kapasiteli stadyum, 10 bin ki\u015fi seyirci kapasiteli kapal\u0131 spor salonu ile 2 bin 500 ki\u015filik seyirci kapasitesine sahip kapal\u0131 y\u00fczme havuzu bulunan projenin kamuyu zarara u\u011fratacak bi\u00e7imde iptal edildi\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fcne var\u0131larak bu zarar\u0131n ba\u015fta Mustafa Akayd\u0131n olmak \u00fczere projenin iptaline yol a\u00e7an 197 say\u0131l\u0131 meclis karar\u0131na onay veren meclis \u00fcyelerine faiziyle birlikte \u00f6dettirilmesine karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>HAKSIZ \u00d6DEME YAPILDI<br \/>\nProje y\u00fcklenicisi taraf\u0131ndan bug\u00fcne kadar tahsil edilen tazminat miktarlar\u0131na vurgu yap\u0131lan raporda; y\u00fcklenici kusuru olmaks\u0131z\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu alan\u0131 hizmet ve sosyal tesis alan\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenleyen ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifas\u0131n\u0131 hukuken imkans\u0131z hale getiren meclis karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131na vurgu yap\u0131larak 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda yersiz bir bi\u00e7imde belediye b\u00fct\u00e7esinden 558 bin 119 lira \u00f6deme ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi belirtildi.<\/p>\n<p>SADECE EL KALDIRDIM<br \/>\nRaporda ifadeleri yer alan \u0130smail Tosun ve Mustafa Re\u015fat Oktay\u2019\u0131n ihale s\u00fcrecine ili\u015fkin kendilerine bilgi verilmedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemeleri dikkat \u00e7ekti. \u0130sa Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019\u0131n ifadesinde ise ihale s\u00fcreci ile ilgili bilgi sahibi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sadece el kald\u0131rmak sureti ile imar plan\u0131na onay verdi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n<p>\u00dcYELERE B\u0130LG\u0130 VER\u0130LMED\u0130<br \/>\nRaporun de\u011ferlendirme k\u0131sm\u0131nda da bu konuya vurgu yap\u0131larak, \u201cMeclis \u00fcyelerine g\u00f6nderilen g\u00fcndem dosyas\u0131nda ilgili alana d\u00f6n\u00fck \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nemde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ihale s\u00fcrecine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir bilgi ya da belgenin yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla karar sonras\u0131nda hukuki bir s\u00fcrecin ba\u015flat\u0131l\u0131p ba\u015flat\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n o tarihte bilinmedi\u011fi\u201d ifadelerine yer verildi.<\/p>\n<p>TAZM\u0130NAT TEMY\u0130ZDE<br \/>\nS\u00fcrece ili\u015fkin bilgilendirme yapan Mustafa Akayd\u0131n ise ihalenin kendisinden \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nemde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, plan notunun iptaline ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n Belediye Meclisi\u2019nde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve i\u015fe plan tadilat\u0131 yap\u0131larak devam edilmesine karar verildi\u011fi ancak Dan\u0131\u015ftay karar\u0131 ile i\u015fin yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. \u0130fadesinde y\u00fckleniciye \u00f6denen tutar\u0131n y\u00fcklenicinin hakk\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve bu tutar\u0131n da mahkeme karar\u0131 ile \u00f6dendi\u011fi belirten Akayd\u0131n tazminat \u00f6demesinin ise temyizde oldu\u011fu ve son bilirki\u015fi raporunun belediyenin lehinde oldu\u011funu kaydetti.<\/p>\n<p>KARAR YANLI\u015e YORUMLANDI<br \/>\nRaporun en can al\u0131c\u0131 noktas\u0131n\u0131 ise Antalya 2\u2019nci \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 2007\/796 E ve 2008\/1885 K say\u0131l\u0131 dosya kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama neticesine y\u00f6nelik yap\u0131lan tespitler olu\u015fturdu. Denet\u00e7i g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekilerek, \u201cMahkemede, \u2018\u2026 blok boyu ve derinli\u011fi \u015fart\u0131 aranmaz\u2026\u2019 \u015feklindeki plan notunun iptaline karar verilmi\u015f, bahse konu yere ili\u015fkin plan\u0131n di\u011fer unsurlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde herhangi bir iptal h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u201d dendi.<\/p>\n<p>BELED\u0130YE H\u0130ZMET ALANI YAPILDI<br \/>\nMahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015f yorumlanarak kamunun zarara u\u011frat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 raporun devam\u0131nda \u015fu bilgilere yer verildi: \u201cBuna kar\u015f\u0131n proje ile ilgili olarak Antalya B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesince a\u00e7\u0131klanan mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7 ve ifadesi a\u015f\u0131larak yeni bir irade ortaya konulmu\u015f, s\u00f6zle\u015fmelere konu alan\u0131n imar plan\u0131 niteli\u011fi k\u00f6kl\u00fc \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Y\u00fcklenici bu konuya itiraz etmi\u015f ancak 12581 ada 6 parselde kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan 40 bin metrekare ta\u015f\u0131nmaz hakk\u0131nda 1\/1000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli imar plan\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131larak bahse konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz MGA\/Ticaret alan\u0131 olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131p Belediye hizmet ve sosyal tesis alan\u0131 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>M\u0130LYONLUK TESP\u0130T<br \/>\nDenet\u00e7i ve savc\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde haks\u0131z fesih i\u015fleminin y\u00fckleniciye tazminat hakk\u0131 do\u011furdu\u011fu dile getirilirken, dava kapsam\u0131nda y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ke\u015fiflerde bilirki\u015fi heyetinin 277 milyon 160 bin 566 lira tazminat alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcndeme getirmesi rapordaki ikinci \u015fok olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. <\/p>\n<p>PROJE S\u00dcRD\u00dcR\u00dcLMED\u0130<br \/>\nAkayd\u0131n ve projenin iptal olmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde olumlu oy kullanan meclis \u00fcyeleri aleyhine ifadeler i\u00e7eren raporun sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ise \u015f\u00f6yle dendi: \u201cSonu\u00e7 olarak; Antalya 2\u2019nci \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan iptal edilen 1\/1000 imar plan\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edilmeyerek kesinle\u015fmesi sonucunda idare s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifas\u0131n\u0131n imkans\u0131z oldu\u011funun mahkeme karar\u0131yla tespiti ile s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi feshedebilir veya \u00fcst \u00f6l\u00e7ekli imar planlar\u0131n\u0131 da s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn k\u0131lacak \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirebilirdi. \u0130dare, bu iki yolu da tercih etmemi\u015f, yarg\u0131 karar\u0131ndan \u00f6nce 197 say\u0131l\u0131 meclis karar\u0131n\u0131 alarak s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifas\u0131n\u0131 imkans\u0131z k\u0131lan taraf konumuna d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>FA\u0130Z\u0130YLE \u00d6DEYECEKLER<br \/>\nBu itibarla Belediye Meclisi taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ifas\u0131n\u0131 imkans\u0131z k\u0131lan imar plan\u0131 karar\u0131 al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve buna mukabil a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131 sonucunda tazminat \u00f6denmesi suretiyle neden olunan 558 bin 119 liral\u0131k kamu zarar\u0131n\u0131n Mustafa Akayd\u0131n, Deniz Filiz, Recep Tokg\u00f6z, Turgay Gen\u00e7, Deniz F\u0131rat Budak, Mehmet Remzi Sadi, Baki \u00c7elik, Muhittin B\u00f6cek, H\u00fcseyin Kazanc\u0131, G\u00fcrsel Karabay\u0131r, Mustafa Karaman, Edip Kemal Bahad\u0131r, Mustafa Re\u015fat Oktay, Erdem Armen, \u0130smail Tosun, Mustafa Y\u0131lmaz, \u0130sa Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m\u2019a m\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen 6085 say\u0131l\u0131 Say\u0131\u015ftay Kanunu\u2019nun 53\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek faizleri ile \u00f6dettirilmesine ayr\u0131ca 197 say\u0131l\u0131 meclis karar\u0131n\u0131 almak suretiyle g\u00f6revinin gereklerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket ederek kamu zarar\u0131na neden olan ve yukar\u0131da adlar\u0131 ge\u00e7en sorumlular hakk\u0131nda gerekli soru\u015fturman\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ve sonucundan bilgi verilmesinin temini i\u00e7in konunun Antalya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na yaz\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demelerle ilgili sorumlular\u0131n (Hasan Basri Y\u0131lmaz) beraat\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ve an\u0131lan karar kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>SAYI\u015eTAY\u2019IN YETK\u0130LER\u0130<br \/>\nSay\u0131\u015ftay, merkez\u00ee y\u00f6netim b\u00fct\u00e7esi kapsam\u0131ndaki kamu idareleri ile sosyal g\u00fcvenlik kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn gelir ve giderleri ile mallar\u0131n\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisi (TBMM) ad\u0131na denetlemek ve sorumlular\u0131n hesap ve i\u015flemlerini kesin h\u00fckme ba\u011flamak ve kanunlarla verilen inceleme, denetleme ve h\u00fckme ba\u011flama i\u015flerini yapmakla g\u00f6revlidir. Say\u0131\u015ftay\u2019\u0131n kesin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri hakk\u0131nda ilgililer yaz\u0131l\u0131 bildirim tarihinden itibaren on be\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde bir kereye mahsus olmak \u00fczere karar d\u00fczeltilmesi isteminde bulunabilirler. Bu kararlar dolay\u0131s\u0131yla idari yarg\u0131 yoluna ba\u015fvurulamaz.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ANTALYA B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediyesi eski Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Menderes T\u00fcrel d\u00f6neminde projelendirilip 21 Ocak 2008 tarihinde projesi imzalanan fakat 2009 yerel se\u00e7imlerinin ard\u0131ndan g\u00f6reve gelen Mustafa Akayd\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan mahkeme kararlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek iptal edilen 100\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc Y\u0131l Spor&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1479,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[34,50,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1478"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1478"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1480,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1478\/revisions\/1480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}