{"id":15261,"date":"2018-12-21T15:33:21","date_gmt":"2018-12-21T12:33:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/?p=15261"},"modified":"2018-12-21T15:50:48","modified_gmt":"2018-12-21T12:50:48","slug":"yavasin-avukati-sahte-senedi-dogruladi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/?p=15261","title":{"rendered":"Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 sahte senedi do\u011frulad\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

KAD\u0130R YILDIZ<\/p>\n

Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 B\u00fclent Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk, 600 bin USD de\u011ferindeki sahte senedin Mansur Yava\u015f taraf\u0131ndan icraya konuldu\u011funu ve bu sebeple senedin y\u00fczde 20\u2019si oran\u0131nda tazminat \u00f6demeye mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fini kabul etti.<\/p>\n

\"yavas-kemal\"<\/a>
\nMANSUR Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n Ankaral\u0131 i\u015fadam\u0131 Necmettin Kesgin\u2019in ad\u0131 ve imzas\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 icra takibi sebebiyle tazminat \u00f6demeye mahk\u00fbm edilmesinin yank\u0131lar\u0131 devam ediyor. Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n evrakta sahtecilik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belgeleyen T\u00fcrkg\u00fcn\u2019\u00fcn haberi, siyaset g\u00fcndemine bomba gibi d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Mansur Yava\u015f avukat\u0131 B\u00fclent Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile gazetemize ihtarname g\u00f6ndererek haberimizi yalanlamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fsa da, Ankara 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131, senetteki imzan\u0131n Ankaral\u0131 i\u015f adam\u0131 Necmettin Kesgin\u2019e ait olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belgeliyor. Mahkeme, senedi i\u015fleme koyan Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet tazminat\u0131 \u00f6demeye mahk\u00fbm etti. Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 B\u00fclent Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk, m\u00fcvekkili Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n resmi evrakta sahtecilik yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederken, ihtarnamedeki beyanlarla Ankara 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulad\u0131. Avukat B\u00fclent Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk, s\u00f6z konusu sahte senedin Mansur Yava\u015f taraf\u0131ndan icraya konuldu\u011funu ve bu sebeple senedin y\u00fczde 20\u2019si oran\u0131nda tazminat \u00f6demeye mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fini kabul etti. Avukat Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk bu kabule ra\u011fmen, \u201cbu durum Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n resmi evrakta sahtecilik yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermez\u201d iddias\u0131nda bulundu.<\/p>\n

\"BELGE3\"<\/a>
\n(Belge 3)<\/p>\n

HANG\u0130 SU\u00c7LARDAN SORU\u015eTURMA GE\u00c7\u0130R\u0130YOR?<\/p>\n

Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 B\u00fclent Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc haberini yalanlamas\u0131na Ankaral\u0131 i\u015f adam\u0131 Necmettin Kesgin\u2019in avukat\u0131 \u00d6zg\u00fcr Ilgaz soru\u015fturma numaralar\u0131yla cevap verdi. Avukat \u00d6zg\u00fcr Ilgaz, Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n Ankara CBS Genel Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosu 2018\/84990, Genel Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosu 2018\/198252 ve Ankara CBS Avukat Su\u00e7lar\u0131 B\u00fcrosu 2017\/39727 numaral\u0131 dosyalar\u0131n, m\u00fcvekkili Necmettin Kesgin\u2019in \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. Kesgin\u2019in avukat\u0131 Ilgaz; Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n resmi belgede sahtecilik, \u015fantaj, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, tehdit, hakaret, huzuru bozma ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z senedi i\u015fleme koyma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 \u015fikayet edildi\u011fini ve hali haz\u0131rda \u00fc\u00e7 ayr\u0131 soru\u015fturma ge\u00e7irdi\u011fini ifade etti.<\/p>\n

DOLANDIRICI DED\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130Z K\u0130\u015e\u0130YLE NE \u0130\u015e\u0130N\u0130Z VARDI?<\/p>\n

Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 B\u00fclent Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk, Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n Necmettin Kesgin ile olan ili\u015fkisini ve medyaya yans\u0131yan senedi yay\u0131nlay\u0131p iddialar\u0131 \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctmek yerine, Necmettin Kesgin hakk\u0131nda farkl\u0131 iddialarda bulunarak kafa kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmaya u\u011fra\u015ft\u0131. Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 17 Aral\u0131k 2018 tarihinde gazetemize g\u00f6nderilen ihtarnamede, Necmettin Kesgin\u2019in doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6nceden haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f senedi Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019a vermek suretiyle resmi belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan 6 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edildi. \u0130\u015f adam\u0131 Necmettin Kesgin\u2019in Avukat\u0131 \u00d6zg\u00fcr Ilgaz, \u201cM\u00fcvekkilim 6 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ald\u0131 ise neden hala elini kolunu sallayarak gezmektedir?\u201d diye sordu. Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 B\u00fclent Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk i\u015f adam\u0131 Necmettin Kesgin keskin hakk\u0131nda \u201cdoland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131\u201d iddias\u0131 ak\u0131llara, \u201cDoland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131yla Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n ne i\u015fi vard\u0131?\u201d sorusunu da getirdi.<\/p>\n

\u201cMAHKEMEDE BA\u015eKA \u0130HTARNAMEDE BA\u015eKA\u201d<\/p>\n

Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m-Bah\u00e7eli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesin ard\u0131ndan ilk a\u00e7\u0131klama Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m-Bah\u00e7eli g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesin ard\u0131ndan ilk a\u00e7\u0131klama
\nAnkaral\u0131 i\u015f adam\u0131 Necmettin Kesgin\u2019in avukat\u0131 \u00d6zg\u00fcr Ilgaz gazetemizin yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n alacakl\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 600 bin USD de\u011ferindeki sahte senet evrak\u0131 ve mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n tamamen ger\u00e7ek oldu\u011funu ve kesinle\u015fmi\u015f kararlar oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. Bu belgelerin Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019a a\u00e7\u0131lan di\u011fer dava dosyalar\u0131na da kesin delil olarak sunuldu\u011funu ifade etti.<\/p>\n

\"BELGE-2\"<\/a>
\n(Belge 2)<\/p>\n

Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamaya cevap veren Avukat \u00d6zg\u00fcr Ilgaz \u201cM\u00fcvekkilimin kendisine ait olmayan ve \u00f6nceden haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f senedi verme su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finden bahsedilmi\u015ftir ki, T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanununda b\u00f6yle bir su\u00e7un tan\u0131m\u0131 dahi yoktur. Keza Mansur Yava\u015f taraf\u0131ndan t\u00fcm mahkemelere sunulan beyanlar da, bu 600 bin USD\u2019lik senedin kendi \u00f6n\u00fcnde imzalan\u0131p verildi\u011fini ve alacakl\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kendisi taraf\u0131ndan dolduruldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.\u201d dedi. Necmettin Kesgin\u2019in avukat\u0131 \u00d6zg\u00fcr Ilgaz \u201cMansur Yava\u015f avukat\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada sahte senedin ba\u015fkas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan doldurulup kendisine getirildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ancak mahkeme kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda ise Mansur Yava\u015f senedin kendi huzurunda yaz\u0131larak imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca senedin bo\u015f olan alacakl\u0131 k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 kendisinin doldurdu\u011funu kabul ederek su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fini mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde kabul etmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 i\u00e7erikli beyanlar Ankara 6. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi ve Ankara 11. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesinde de Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan mahkemelere sunulmu\u015ftur.\u201d \u0130fadelerini kulland\u0131.<\/p>\n

YALANLAYAN BELGE<\/p>\n

13.08.2015 tarihinde Ankara 1. \u0130cra Hukuk Mahkemesindeki duru\u015fma celsesinde Mansur Yava\u015f vekilleri \u201cTakip dayana\u011f\u0131 senetteki imza m\u00fcvekkilimin bizzat huzurunda g\u00f6z\u00fc \u00f6n\u00fcnde at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir imzad\u0131r\u201d \u015feklinde beyanda bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, gazetemize g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi ihtarnamede senedin \u00f6nceden imzalanarak verildi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\"BELGE-1\"<\/a>
\n(Belge 1)<\/p>\n

Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131, Ankara 6. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi dosyas\u0131na 23.12.2015 tarihinde verdi\u011fi savunmada da, \u201cBu davaya konu 600.000 USD de\u011ferindeki bono m\u00fcvekkilimin (Mansur Yava\u015f) dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k \u00fccreti alaca\u011f\u0131na mahsuben \u00f6denmek \u00fczere, alacakl\u0131 ve vade k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131 bo\u015f kalacak \u015fekilde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k bono olarak tanzim edilerek davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fcvekkilime teslim edilmi\u015ftir.\u201d ifadesine yer verdi. Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu senet \u00fczerindeki \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlar\u0131, Necmettin Kesgin ile olan mahkeme dosyas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6rtbas giri\u015fimi olarak yorumland\u0131. Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019a soruyoruz: Doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olarak tarif etti\u011finiz Necmettin Kesgin ile nas\u0131l tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131n\u0131z? Necmettin Keskin ile yollar\u0131n\u0131z nas\u0131l kesi\u015fti ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olarak niteledi\u011finiz biriyle ne t\u00fcr i\u015fler yapt\u0131n\u0131z? Alacakl\u0131 olarak ad\u0131n\u0131z\u0131n bulundu\u011fu 600 bin USD de\u011ferindeki sahte senedi ne kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda icraya koydunuz? Necmettin Kesgin\u2019in icra talebiyle mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131za haciz konuldu mu? Necmettin Kesgin\u2019e kaset \u00fczerinden \u015fantaj yapt\u0131n\u0131z m\u0131? Necmettin Kesgin\u2019e istedi\u011finiz paray\u0131 vermesi durumunda elinizdeki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri kendisine verece\u011finizi s\u00f6ylediniz mi? Eski bir HSYK \u00fcyesi Necmettin Kesgin ve size arac\u0131l\u0131k etti mi?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

KAD\u0130R YILDIZ Mansur Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 B\u00fclent Y\u00fccet\u00fcrk, 600 bin USD de\u011ferindeki sahte senedin Mansur Yava\u015f taraf\u0131ndan icraya konuldu\u011funu ve bu sebeple senedin y\u00fczde 20\u2019si oran\u0131nda tazminat \u00f6demeye mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fini kabul etti. MANSUR Yava\u015f\u2019\u0131n Ankaral\u0131...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15266,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,50,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15261"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15261"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15261\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15269,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15261\/revisions\/15269"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/15266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.belediyeler.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}